Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Overt antisemitism is 2 to 3 times stronger on the American far right compared to the far left, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
July 28, 2022
in Political Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research provides evidence that antisemitic attitudes are far more prevalent on the political right in the United States. The study, published in Political Research Quarterly, indicates that prejudicial attitudes towards Jews is particularly strong among younger conservatives.

High profile incidents in the United States have raised concerns about the resurgence of antisemitism. While many of these incidents have been linked to the far right, other such incidents have been linked to left-wing groups. But the authors behind the new study observed that there was very little research into whether hatred toward Jews was more common among the far right or the far left.

“This started with conversations with Laura Royden, a PhD student at Harvard and my co-author on three studies on this topic. A few years ago, popular books about antisemitism (by Bari Weiss and by Deborah Lipstadt) discussed antisemitism in the United States as coming from both the ideological left and right,” explained study author Eitan D. Hersh (@eitanhersh), an associate professor of political science at Tufts University.

“The authors had interesting anecdotes about left versus right antisemitism. But Laura and I noticed there wasn’t much quantitative research about the relationship between political ideology and antisemitic attitudes. So we started working on a study that would capture different manifestations of anti-Jewish prejudice across the ideological spectrum. We focused the study on young people because past research had suggested that the young left and young right are hotbeds of antisemitism.”

Using the polling company YouGov, the researchers surveyed 3,500 U.S. adults, including a representative oversample of 2,500 adults ages 18–30, regarding their political ideology and attitudes towards Jews. Political ideology was measured using a 7-point scale. The respondents were also asked whether they identified as leftist, socialist, progressive, libertarian, Christian conservative, or alt-right.

The survey assessed subtler forms of prejudicial views (anti-Jewish double standards) as well as overtly antisemitic attitudes. For example, the respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with antisemitic statements such as “Jews are more loyal to Israel than to America” and “Jews in the United States have too much power.”

The researchers found evidence of an anti-Jewish double standard on the left. Those on the political left held Jewish Americans more responsible for the actions of Israel than they held Catholic Americans or Indian Americans responsible for the Vatican or India.

Additionally, 31% of very liberal respondents said Muslim Americans should denounce Muslim countries’ discrimination against non-Muslims, whereas 47% said that Jewish Americans should denounce Israel’s discrimination against non-Jews. Very conservative respondents showed an opposite pattern — an anti-Muslim double standard.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

However, Hersh and Royden found that young far-right Americans were seven times more likely to believe that Jewish Americans should be held to account for Israel compared to young far-left Americans.

Moreover, the researchers found that agreement with overtly antisemitic statements increased from left to right. Agreement with the statements was 2-3 times higher on the far right compared to the far left. “Even when primed with information that most U.S. Jews have favorable views toward Israel — a country disfavored by the ideological left — respondents on the left rarely support statements such as that Jews have too much power or should be boycotted,” the researchers noted.

“In terms of ideology and antisemitism, we find that overt antisemitic attitudes are much more common on the young far right than the young far left,” Hersh told PsyPost. “The young right holds more prejudicial views than older conservatives as well as than liberals of all ages. On the left, we see some evidence of anti-Jewish double standards, where Jews are held to a different standard of accountability for a foreign country than are other minorities groups, such as Muslim Americans or Indian Americans. But the level of agreement with antisemitic claims is much higher on the right.”

“In this paper, we also briefly discuss a separate set of findings (which we dive into in a whole separate paper, under review) that, quite separate from an ideological effect, there is a big racial effect,” Hersh added. “Young Black and Hispanic Americans are as likely to agree to antisemitic statements as the White alt-right. Differences by racial group are apparent both among liberals and conservatives.”

The researchers controlled for factors such as age, race, and education. But the study — like all research — includes some caveats.

“We measured antisemitism in a few ways in the paper, but there are other ways to measure these prejudicial attitudes,” Hersh explained. “Some people have suggested to us that the young left and young right could have similar antisemitic views but the right is either more willing to say what they think than the left or they are more eager to agree to statements they know are anti-politically correct even if they don’t really believe them. Obviously, lots can be going on beneath the surface of these findings. But we hope that this study helps re-orient research on this topic around careful, replicable social science.”

“We just released all the survey data if any other researchers want to look it over and write their own papers! https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/antisemitism”

The study, “Antisemitic Attitudes Across the Ideological Spectrum“, was published June 25, 2022.

Previous Post

Re-analysis of meta-analysis reveals no evidence for nudging once accounting for publication bias

Next Post

People hold incorrect beliefs about how much to talk in conversations

RELATED

This psychological factor might help unite America or “destroy us from within”
Political Psychology

The psychological divide between Democrats and Republicans during democratic backsliding

April 2, 2026
Study links phubbing sensitivity to attachment patterns in romantic couples
Artificial Intelligence

How generative artificial intelligence is upending theories of political persuasion

April 1, 2026
Belief in the harmfulness of speech is linked to both progressive ideology and symptoms of depression
Political Psychology

Belief in the harmfulness of speech is linked to both progressive ideology and symptoms of depression

April 1, 2026
Shifting genetic tides: How early language skills forecast ADHD and literacy outcomes
Authoritarianism

How a twin study untangled the surprising roots of authoritarian political beliefs

March 31, 2026
High meat consumption may protect against cognitive decline in people with a specific Alzheimer’s gene
Political Psychology

Metacognitive training reduces hostility between left-wing and right-wing voters

March 28, 2026
New Harry Potter study links Gryffindor and Slytherin personalities to heightened entrepreneurship
Moral Psychology

New psychology research pinpoints a key factor separating liberal and conservative morality

March 25, 2026
Brain MRI scans showing different views and slices for neurological and psychological research, highlighting brain structure and function analysis.
Neuroimaging

Brain scans reveal Democrats and Republicans use different neural pathways to buy groceries

March 23, 2026
Severe borderline traits in bipolar disorder are linked to early maladaptive schemas
Political Psychology

Left-leaning support for redistribution stems from perceived unfairness rather than malicious envy

March 23, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • When sales managers serve first, salespeople stay longer and sell more confidently
  • Emotional intelligence linked to better sales performance
  • When a goal-driven boss ignores relationships, manipulative employees may fight back
  • When salespeople fail to hit their targets, inner drive matters more than bonus checks
  • The “dark” personality traits that predict sales success — and when they backfire

LATEST

Autism risk genes are shared across human ancestries, large genome study reveals

Scientists identify a brain signal that reveals whether depression therapies will work

Large-scale study links autoimmune diseases to higher rates of depression and anxiety

Smoked cannabis reduces immediate alcohol consumption in controlled laboratory trial

Vulnerable narcissism is linked to intense celebrity worship via parasocial relationships

Brain scans reveal the neural fingerprints of dark personality traits

The psychological divide between Democrats and Republicans during democratic backsliding

Psychology researchers have determined the best time to text after a first date

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc