Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

People with intellectual humility tend to handle relationship conflicts better, new study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
April 16, 2025
in Relationships and Sexual Health, Social Psychology
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A new study published in the Journal of Research in Personality suggests that intellectual humility—recognizing the possibility that one’s beliefs might be wrong—is linked to more constructive conflict behavior and greater relationship satisfaction in romantic couples. In particular, men who scored higher in intellectual humility tended to report stronger bonds with their partners and were also rated more favorably by those partners across several aspects of relationship quality.

Intellectual humility refers to the tendency to recognize that one’s own views could be flawed. The researchers behind the study were interested in how this mindset influences romantic relationships, especially during conflict. Disagreements are common in long-term partnerships, and how couples handle these disagreements can have a lasting impact on relationship satisfaction. While past research has highlighted the importance of communication skills and empathy, intellectual humility had not been closely examined as a factor in how couples navigate conflict.

“We were inspired to learn more about the many ways that intellectual humility manifests – from large-scale global affairs to everyday interpersonal interactions. The way that people navigate disagreements in close relationships is important to relationship quality and satisfaction and we were interested in the role that intellectual humility plays in such conflicts in romantic relationships,” explained study author Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno, an assistant professor of psychology at Elon University.

The research team recruited 74 heterosexual couples from the southeastern United States, including married, cohabiting, engaged, and dating individuals. The participants ranged in age from 21 to 61, with an average age of about 32. Most had been together for several years, and the majority had at least a college education.

Each participant completed a battery of surveys separately from their partner. These included a validated scale measuring intellectual humility with items like “I accept that my beliefs and attitudes might be wrong.” They also rated their satisfaction with the relationship, how much they liked and loved their partner, how often they argued, and how well they got along.

Additionally, they reported on their own and their partner’s behavior during disagreements—such as raising their voice, admitting fault, or trying to understand the other’s position—and rated what they believed their partner’s goals were during those conflicts, such as wanting to win the argument or find a solution.

The researchers analyzed the data using a method that allowed them to assess how each partner’s level of intellectual humility related to both their own and their partner’s responses. They found that higher levels of intellectual humility in men were associated with higher relationship satisfaction—not only for the men themselves but also for their partners. Men who scored higher in humility also reported a stronger emotional bond with their partners and were seen by their partners as easier to get along with and less likely to engage in frequent arguments.

Interestingly, women’s intellectual humility was not significantly related to their partner’s relationship satisfaction or conflict experiences. It was, however, linked to their own perceptions. Women who were more intellectually humble saw themselves as behaving more constructively during disagreements and were more likely to believe that their partner had positive motives in conflicts, such as trying to understand them or find common ground.

One of the study’s more nuanced findings was that intellectual humility influenced not just how people acted, but how they perceived and responded to their partner’s actions. For instance, men who had female partners with higher humility were more likely to report that they themselves behaved better during arguments. This suggests that a partner’s humility may encourage more respectful and less reactive behavior, particularly among men who are otherwise average or lower in humility themselves.

Despite these associations, the study did not find strong evidence for a synergistic effect when both partners were high in intellectual humility. In other words, having two humble partners did not necessarily amplify relationship benefits beyond what was observed when one partner was humble. Most effects appeared to be additive, meaning that the presence of humility in at least one partner helped—but didn’t multiply—positive outcomes.

“In general, the more people are willing to recognize that their viewpoint may be wrong, the more satisfaction, liking, and love is reported in their romantic relationships,” Jongman-Sereno told PsyPost. “So, valuing perspectives that differ from one’s own and being willing to reconsider one’s beliefs in the face of conflicting evidence may be a key to more satisfying interpersonal relationships. We also found that men’s level of intellectual humility played a bigger role in positive relationship outcomes than women’s.”

But the researchers caution against drawing strong conclusions about causality, given the nature of the study. All data came from self-reports or partner-reports rather than objective observations. While participants’ ratings of themselves and their partners were moderately correlated—suggesting reasonable accuracy—future studies using direct observation of conflict behaviors may provide a clearer picture of how humility influences interpersonal dynamics.

Another limitation is the sample composition. All couples were heterosexual, and most participants were relatively young and well-educated. Since gender differences emerged—particularly in how men’s humility was more consistently related to both their own and their partners’ experiences—the authors suggest that future research should explore whether similar patterns hold in same-sex relationships or in more diverse samples.

The study also raises questions about how intellectual humility might be fostered and whether interventions designed to increase it could help couples experiencing frequent or intense conflict. Although most existing programs to boost intellectual humility have been developed in educational settings, the researchers suggest that relationship counseling could incorporate strategies to help partners reflect on the fallibility of their own beliefs and become more open to alternative perspectives.

The study, “Intellectual humility in romantic relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction, argument frequency, and conflict behaviors,” was authored by Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno a, Jessica C. Reich, Richard S. Pond Jr., and Mark R. Leary.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Anxious attachment linked to depression spillover in romantic relationships, study finds
Attachment Styles

Anxious attachment linked to depression spillover in romantic relationships, study finds

May 23, 2025

Women with anxious attachment styles are more likely to experience increases in depressive symptoms if their partners show signs of depression, according to a four-year study of German couples.

Read moreDetails
Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news
Artificial Intelligence

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

May 23, 2025

Researchers developed a large-scale system that detects political bias in web-based news outlets by examining topic selection, tone, and coverage patterns. The AI tool offers transparency and accuracy—even outperforming large language models.

Read moreDetails
A man and woman laying on a bed
Relationships and Sexual Health

Study uncovers three sexual power profiles—and only one is linked to relationship satisfaction

May 22, 2025

A new study reveals that people with flexible gender beliefs and low interest in dominance are most satisfied in relationships, while those with conflicting views on gender roles report more distress.

Read moreDetails
Scientists uncover potential genetic mechanisms behind the sex bias observed in autism
Political Psychology

Genetic essentialism more common among supporters of radical right-wing parties

May 21, 2025

A new study finds that people who support far-right populist parties in Sweden and Norway are more likely to believe that genes determine social traits, raising concerns about the political implications of genetic essentialism and its links to discrimination.

Read moreDetails
Narcissism negatively predicts partner-enhancement in romantic relationships
Narcissism

Narcissists are more likely to become addicted to social networking sites

May 21, 2025

A study tracking Polish adults over eight months finds that nearly all narcissism types, except sanctity, are tied to social networking site addiction. Some traits even show a bidirectional relationship with addiction symptoms, shedding light on digital-age personality dynamics.

Read moreDetails
New study highlights power—not morality—as key motivator behind competitive victimhood
Social Psychology

New study highlights power—not morality—as key motivator behind competitive victimhood

May 21, 2025

A replication study conducted during the first wave of COVID-19 confirms that need for power, rather than moral concerns, best predicts competitive victimhood in Israeli Arabs and Jews, pointing to deeply rooted motivations in intergroup conflict.

Read moreDetails
Attractiveness shapes beliefs about whether faces are real or AI-generated, study finds
Artificial Intelligence

Attractiveness shapes beliefs about whether faces are real or AI-generated, study finds

May 21, 2025

A new study published in Acta Psychologica reveals that people’s judgments about whether a face is real or AI-generated are influenced by facial attractiveness and personality traits such as narcissism and honesty-humility—even when all the images are of real people.

Read moreDetails
Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences
Business

Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences

May 21, 2025

A new study reveals that brain activity, particularly in regions linked to emotion, predicts market preferences more accurately than self-reported choices—especially when samples aren’t demographically representative. Neural signals offered consistent forecasts even when behavioral data failed.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists challenge “dopamine detox” trend with evidence from avoidance learning

Non-right-handedness is more common across multiple mental health conditions

Withdrawal symptoms are common after stopping antidepressants

Anxious attachment linked to depression spillover in romantic relationships, study finds

Scientists find 16 new Alzheimer’s-linked genes using multi-ancestry genome data

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

Gut bacteria can influence how brain proteins are modified by carbohydrates

“Tiger mom” parenting boosts teens’ cognitive skills but undermines emotional development, study suggests

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy