Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Evolutionary Psychology

Self-sniffing: Just a quirk or something more? Here’s what a recent study found

by Mane Kara-Yakoubian
January 13, 2024
in Evolutionary Psychology
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Why do people engage in self-sniffing? A new study published in Physiology & Behavior concluded that olfactory self-inspection serves numerous functions, which varies based on the specific body part being sniffed.

Various studies have found that people touch their face without a particular reason. This type of behavior might serve a regulatory or odor-inspection function. Sniffing hands, especially after shaking hands, seems to be a way of checking one’s own body odor or that of the other person. Frequency of self-sniffing varies with culture, gender, and age, and there are also variations in the frequency of sniffing different body parts.

Self-sniffing could help monitor health and hygiene status or manage one’s appearance. Body odor can convey information about a person’s physiological and emotional state, and this information can likewise be perceived by others. In this work, Dagmar Schwambergová and colleagues “investigated the frequency of olfactory self-inspection and its possible functions.”

A pilot study was conducted to determine the relevant body parts and contexts for self-sniffing. Participants included 124 Czech individuals recruited through emails and lectures at Charles University. They responded to questions assessing the incidence and frequency of indirectly sniffing various body parts or worn clothes, such as through hand contact, on a scale of 1 (never or almost never) to 7 (several times a day). They also responded to open-ended questions assessing the context of such behavior (e.g., “In what situations do you smell your own armpits?”). This qualitative data was used to adapt the self-sniffing inventory that was used.

The final sample for the main study included a total of 209 participants. Participants completed a socio-demographic survey (e.g., age, gender, education, and occupation) and a self-sniffing inventory of 35 items assessing the frequency of self-sniffing various body parts (e.g., “Do you ever smell your hand after touching your genitals?”) and clothes, and the context in which they engaged in that behavior.

The study included other measures as well, such as a health-related survey (e.g., “Do you use any medication prescribed by your practitioner?”), hygiene inventory (e.g., “When you wash your hands, approximately how long do you wash them for?”), Three Domain Disgust Scale (including moral, sexual, and pathogen disgust), and Body Odor Disgust Scale assessing internal (e.g., “You are alone at home and notice that your feet are very smelly”) and external (e.g., “You are sitting next to a stranger and notice that his feet are very smelly”) odor sources.

A Principal Component Analysis revealed three distinct dimensions of self-sniffing, including social acceptability self-inspection (involving areas like armpits, breath, and worn clothes), intimate self-inspection (covering private parts like genitals and anus), and cosmetic self-inspection (related to areas where fragranced products are applied, like hair and hands).

The researchers observed no gender differences in the social acceptability and cosmetic dimensions of self-inspection. However, men engaged in more intimate self-inspection than women. Participants with health issues more often engaged in social acceptability self-inspection, likely to monitor changes in odor due to illness. Further, those with lower hygiene standards were more inclined towards intimate self-inspection. The most frequently sniffed body parts were hands and worn t-shirts.

This study suggests that self-sniffing serves different functions depending on the body part, with potential roles in health monitoring, hygiene checks, as well as social and sexual contexts.

A limitation to this work is that data collection relied on self-reports. Participants may not be fully aware of the self-sniffing behavior they engage in, or may be influenced by the social desirability bias. Future research may consider direct observation for the social acceptability and cosmetic dimensions of self-inspection.

The study, “Olfactory self-inspection: Own body odour provides cues to one’s health and hygiene status”, was authored by Dagmar Schwambergová, Jitka Třebická Fialová, and Jan Havlíček.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms
Attractiveness

New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms

May 18, 2025

A new study of indigenous men in Papua, Indonesia, found that exposure to topless women during youth did not reduce sexual interest in female breasts—suggesting male attraction to breasts may stem from evolved biology rather than cultural taboos.

Read moreDetails
Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders
Authoritarianism

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders

May 12, 2025

Do muscles make a man a better leader? That depends on your politics. A new study finds conservatives are drawn to strong men in leadership roles, while left-wing authoritarians are more likely to shy away from physical dominance.

Read moreDetails
Scientists use economic game to reveal sex differences in jealousy triggers
Evolutionary Psychology

Scientists use economic game to reveal sex differences in jealousy triggers

May 8, 2025

A lab-based economic game revealed that women report more jealousy than men when their partners give money to a romantic rival. The findings offer new support for theories that jealousy evolved to protect key social bonds from potential threats.

Read moreDetails
Women also prefer younger romantic partners, according to a major new psychology study
Dating

Women also prefer younger romantic partners, according to a major new psychology study

May 6, 2025

A new study finds that both men and women are slightly more attracted to younger partners during blind dates, challenging the common belief that only men prioritize youth. These real-world findings reveal a mismatch between people’s stated preferences and actual desire.

Read moreDetails
More intelligent people hit puberty earlier but tend to reproduce later, study finds
Evolutionary Psychology

More intelligent people hit puberty earlier but tend to reproduce later, study finds

May 1, 2025

People with higher intelligence mature sexually at a younger age but tend to reproduce less overall, according to a new study. The findings offer insight into how biological readiness and personal choices shaped by intelligence can lead to unexpected reproductive patterns.

Read moreDetails
Men show stronger aversion to economic inequality than women when mating is at stake, study finds
Evolutionary Psychology

Men show stronger aversion to economic inequality than women when mating is at stake, study finds

April 30, 2025

In a series of studies, men showed stronger aversion than women to high inequality when thinking about finding a life partner. The results suggest that inequality shapes mating prospects differently for each sex.

Read moreDetails
Science confirms the “sexual afterglow” is real — and pinpoints factors that make it linger longer
Attractiveness

Age, education, and income are surprisingly weak predictors of mate preferences

April 26, 2025

Think success shapes your dating standards? A new study finds that factors like income, education, and age barely predict romantic expectations, while self-image matters more.

Read moreDetails
Right-wing authoritarianism appears to have a genetic foundation
Evolutionary Psychology

Life satisfaction and personality share strong genetic roots, new findings reveal

April 20, 2025

New research published in the Journal of Personality & Social Psychology shows that both personality traits and life satisfaction are significantly more heritable than previously thought.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Mindfulness may be a window into brain health in early Alzheimer’s risk

Judgments of breast attractiveness show surprising consistency across gender, race, and orientation

Neuroscientists challenge “dopamine detox” trend with evidence from avoidance learning

Non-right-handedness is more common across multiple mental health conditions

Withdrawal symptoms are common after stopping antidepressants

Anxious attachment linked to depression spillover in romantic relationships, study finds

Scientists find 16 new Alzheimer’s-linked genes using multi-ancestry genome data

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy