Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Attractiveness

Age, education, and income are surprisingly weak predictors of mate preferences

by Eric W. Dolan
April 26, 2025
in Attractiveness, Evolutionary Psychology
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

A new study published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior finds that people’s preferences for desirable and undesirable traits in romantic partners are only weakly tied to their age, income, education, or number of past relationships. Women were generally more selective than men across a broad range of characteristics. But more than any objective factor, how desirable people believed themselves to be played the strongest role—albeit still a small one—in shaping their expectations for a partner.

Prior research has shown that people are generally attracted to traits like kindness, intelligence, and physical attractiveness, while avoiding characteristics such as arrogance or hostility. Much of this work has focused on preferences alone, but this study also explored what people actively want to avoid in a partner. Drawing from evolutionary theory, the authors aimed to test whether people who perceive themselves as more desirable—or who score higher on other “mate value” indicators—set higher standards for both what they want and what they avoid in a romantic partner.

“We were interested in this topic because it is a common assumption in evolutionary psychology that certain ‘objective’ characteristics, such as age, education, and income, are associated with mating success and, consequently, mate preferences,” said study author Zsófia Csajbók, an assistant professor of psychology at Charles University.

“From an evolutionary perspective, younger individuals are considered more desirable due to their larger reproductive reserve. Similarly, individuals with higher education are assumed to be more intelligent and have a greater capacity for financial success, making them more desirable as partners. Additionally, those who are perceived as more desirable are often thought to have higher mating standards.”

“However, previous research has often shown weak associations between these ‘objective’ characteristics and mate preferences. One reason for these weak associations is that earlier studies often lacked sufficient diversity in their data, which may have hindered the demonstration of expected associations. Our aim was to show that, even with a nationally representative and fairly diverse sample, these associations remain relatively weak, although they are in the expected direction.”

The study involved a nationally representative online sample of 2,280 adults aged 18 to 50 living in Czechia. Participants completed a comprehensive survey that included questions about their own demographics (such as income, education, and relationship history), self-perceived desirability as a partner, and what they wanted or did not want in an ideal partner. The researchers asked participants to rate how much they valued seven desirable traits—like warmth, attractiveness, and intelligence—and how much they wanted to avoid eight undesirable traits—like abusiveness, depression, or uncleanliness.

The researchers also examined factors associated with different mating strategies, such as the number of sexual or romantic partners a person had, whether they were currently in a relationship, and the number of children they had. These life outcomes were used to infer broader mating orientations and real-world indicators of mate value. Statistical models were used to analyze how these variables predicted people’s romantic preferences and aversions, and whether these patterns differed by sex.

In line with previous research, Csajbók and her colleagues found that women placed more importance than men on traits like warmth, social status, and dominance, while men placed more value on physical attractiveness. In terms of undesirable traits, women were more strongly averse to partners who were unambitious, hostile, arrogant, clingy, abusive, or depressed. Across both sexes, the most valued trait was warmth, and the least valued was social status. For aversions, hostility and abusiveness were the most undesirable traits, while clinginess was seen as the least problematic.

While these findings aligned with prior research and evolutionary theory—where women are expected to be more selective due to the higher biological costs of reproduction—the most striking outcome was how little any of the variables predicted people’s preferences. Self-perceived mate value explained about 1% of the variance in men’s preferences and 2% in women’s. When all measured factors were combined—including education, income, relationship history, and age—they still explained only 3% of the variation in men’s preferences and 5% in women’s.

“Mate desirability and mate preferences are subjective and difficult to predict using objective indicators,” Csajbók told PsyPost. “This could be seen as good news. How desirable we and others perceive ourselves to be is highly subjective and doesn’t operate in a simple, rational way. Factors like age, education, or income do not strongly predict whether people will have high mating standards.”

Interestingly, desirable traits were better predicted than undesirable ones, and women’s preferences were more strongly associated with their own characteristics than men’s were. For example, women who rated themselves as more desirable also placed higher importance on a partner’s attractiveness, passion, and dominance. Education and household income were also more predictive of women’s mate preferences than men’s, with more educated or higher-earning women expecting more from their partners—particularly in terms of intelligence and emotional stability.

Nonlinear associations were also explored, such as whether preferences changed as people aged or as their education increased. These effects were present but modest. Age had only a trivial impact on mate preferences across the 18–50 age range. Education showed a slightly stronger association, especially among women, who showed less tolerance for undesirable traits such as hostility, unattractiveness, and depression as their education level increased. Self-perceived mate value also showed some nonlinear patterns, especially among women, with preferences for traits like dominance or stability rising more steeply at higher levels of perceived desirability.

The researchers also explored how relationship experiences influenced preferences. For instance, those with more sexual or romantic partners reported higher expectations in traits like passion and lower tolerance for traits like depression. But the longer people were in a relationship, the more their expectations seemed to relax, particularly for traits like attractiveness or dominance. Women with more children also showed lower expectations for certain traits, including attractiveness and intellect.

Despite these patterns, the study consistently found that most of the variability in mate preferences and aversions remained unexplained. Even with a large and diverse sample, demographic characteristics and mating history accounted for only a small fraction of the differences in what people want—or don’t want—in a partner.

“Not having the ‘objectively’ desirable traits (such as those often assumed by stereotypes) does not necessarily predetermine our mating success,” Csajbók explained. “People have a variety of reasons for setting their preferences, and mate choice and relationships are likely more complex than can be explained by just a few selection criteria.”

But the study, like all research, has some limitations. Although the sample was diverse and nationally representative, it was limited to people in Czechia and mostly heterosexual. The use of a single-item measure for self-perceived mate value may also limit the precision of those findings.

The researchers also note that their design did not distinguish between short-term and long-term partner preferences, which might affect how people prioritize different traits. They intentionally avoided this distinction to prevent introducing artificial categories that might not reflect participants’ real-life intentions.

“It is crucial to conduct this kind of research using large, sufficiently diverse datasets,” Csajbók said. “Much of the existing evidence in this area is based on small samples of university students from the United States, which makes it difficult to generalize. Our study, conducted in the Czech Republic, is from an industrialized, developed country, but it is culturally different from the majority of studies in this field.”

The study, “Observed Aspects of Mate Value and Sociosexuality Account for Mate Preferences: Data from a Large, Representative Study from Czechia,” was authored by Zsófia Csajbók, Zuzana Štěrbová, Peter K. Jonason, Lucie Jelínková, Jakub Binter, and Jan Havlíček.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms
Attractiveness

New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms

May 18, 2025

A new study of indigenous men in Papua, Indonesia, found that exposure to topless women during youth did not reduce sexual interest in female breasts—suggesting male attraction to breasts may stem from evolved biology rather than cultural taboos.

Read moreDetails
Diet quality and abdominal fat in midlife are linked to brain health in older age
Attractiveness

Biographical details influence how attractive we find faces and change how our brains respond, study finds

May 14, 2025

A new brain imaging study suggests that learning even brief personal details—such as political views or psychiatric history—can alter how attractive someone’s face appears. The brain responds by activating areas involved in processing language, values, and social meaning.

Read moreDetails
Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders
Authoritarianism

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders

May 12, 2025

Do muscles make a man a better leader? That depends on your politics. A new study finds conservatives are drawn to strong men in leadership roles, while left-wing authoritarians are more likely to shy away from physical dominance.

Read moreDetails
Scientists use economic game to reveal sex differences in jealousy triggers
Evolutionary Psychology

Scientists use economic game to reveal sex differences in jealousy triggers

May 8, 2025

A lab-based economic game revealed that women report more jealousy than men when their partners give money to a romantic rival. The findings offer new support for theories that jealousy evolved to protect key social bonds from potential threats.

Read moreDetails
Eye-tracking study reveals which facial features truly matter in attraction
Attractiveness

Eye-tracking study reveals which facial features truly matter in attraction

May 7, 2025

A study published in The Laryngoscope reveals that eye movements during face evaluation can predict attractiveness judgments. Men are drawn to women’s mouths, while women are more influenced by men’s eyes and hair.

Read moreDetails
Women also prefer younger romantic partners, according to a major new psychology study
Dating

Women also prefer younger romantic partners, according to a major new psychology study

May 6, 2025

A new study finds that both men and women are slightly more attracted to younger partners during blind dates, challenging the common belief that only men prioritize youth. These real-world findings reveal a mismatch between people’s stated preferences and actual desire.

Read moreDetails
More intelligent people hit puberty earlier but tend to reproduce later, study finds
Evolutionary Psychology

More intelligent people hit puberty earlier but tend to reproduce later, study finds

May 1, 2025

People with higher intelligence mature sexually at a younger age but tend to reproduce less overall, according to a new study. The findings offer insight into how biological readiness and personal choices shaped by intelligence can lead to unexpected reproductive patterns.

Read moreDetails
Men show stronger aversion to economic inequality than women when mating is at stake, study finds
Evolutionary Psychology

Men show stronger aversion to economic inequality than women when mating is at stake, study finds

April 30, 2025

In a series of studies, men showed stronger aversion than women to high inequality when thinking about finding a life partner. The results suggest that inequality shapes mating prospects differently for each sex.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

What brain scans reveal about the neural correlates of pornography consumption

AI chatbots often misrepresent scientific studies — and newer models may be worse

Is gender-affirming care helping or harming mental health?

Study finds “zombie” neurons in the peripheral nervous system contribute to chronic pain

Therapeutic video game shows promise for post-COVID cognitive recovery

Passive scrolling linked to increased anxiety in teens, study finds

Your bodily awareness guides your morality, new neuroscience study suggests

Where you flirt matters: New research shows setting shapes romantic success

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy