Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive COVID-19

Study links greater trust in Donald Trump to greater bias toward Asian people amid the coronavirus pandemic

by Eric W. Dolan
August 17, 2020
in COVID-19, Donald Trump
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

President Donald Trump frequently refers to the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 as the “China virus.” New research indicates that his followers are more likely than other Americans to admit they would engage in discriminatory behavior toward people of Asian descent.

Besides trust in President Trump, the new study in the International Journal of Public Health has uncovered several factors related to negative attitudes toward Asians amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We were interested in this topic because we were following how quickly Asian Americans began to report increased discrimination and violence in response to the onset of COVID-19 in the United States,” said study authors Lindsay Y. Dhanani and Berkeley Franz, who are both assistant professors at Ohio University.

“It was difficult to follow the news cycle without reading a story about an Asian American being verbally harassed or physically attacked, or of Americans avoiding Asian-owned restaurants and businesses. We were also seeing a lot of stigmatizing language being used to describe the virus and blame Asian Americans for the spread of COVID-19 in the United States, which seemed to strengthen stigma and harassment.”

“As a psychologist and sociologist who are broadly interested in intergroup relations, we wanted to examine what about COVID-19 might be contributing to these growing hostilities and we wanted to do so in a more systematic way than just relying on anecdotal reports of discrimination.”

The study, based on surveys of 1,141 U.S. residents in March 2020, found that more than over 40% of people reported they would engage in at least one biased and discriminatory behavior toward people of Asian descent, such as refusing to sit next to an Asian person on a bus or avoiding ordering food prepared by restaurants with Asian employees.

The researchers found that men, nonwhite individuals, and Republicans tended to report greater bias towards people of Asian descent compared to the rest of the sample. In addition, greater fear of contracting COVID-19, less accurate knowledge about the virus, and greater trust in President Trump were also associated with higher levels of bias. Participants with more trust in science and greater knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, on the other hand, reported less bias.

“The most important takeaway from our study is that COVID-19 does appear to be stoking bias toward Asian Americans in ways that can be very damaging to the short-term and long-term wellbeing of Asian Americans. Importantly, at the same time that Asian Americans are facing the physical risks of COVID-19 infection that all of us are facing, this group is disproportionately being exposed to stress and discrimination which is linked to both physical, mental, and economic harm,” Dhanani and Franz told PsyPost.

“We further found that bias toward Asian Americans is highest among people who were less accurately informed about the virus, were more fearful of the virus, distrusted science, and placed greater trust in President Trump. These findings highlight the power that leaders and news outlets have in shaping the discrimination against Asian Americans that has continued to unfold in response to COVID-19 and suggest that a coordinated and robust public health response may not only save lives, but limit exposure to stigma and discrimination among minority groups.”

The study controlled for gender, age, race, education, sexual orientation, political affiliation, and whether people were practicing social distancing. But like all research, it includes some limitations.

“The biggest caveat to our study is that it did not use an experimental design to determine the causal relationship among variables. We really need additional work that uses more rigorous designs to know for sure if the response to COVID-19 in the United States is causing bias and discrimination. Research is also needed from the perspective of Asian Americans to truly capture their experiences amid the crisis and how the public health response to COVID-19 in the United States has affected minority mental and physical health,” the researchers explained.

(Photo credit: Joyce N. Boghosian)

TweetSendScanShareSendPin6ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors
Artificial Intelligence

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

July 15, 2025

Can an AI understand a political metaphor? Researchers pitted ChatGPT against the speeches of Donald Trump to find out. The model showed moderate success in detection but ultimately struggled with context, highlighting the current limits of automated language analysis.

Read moreDetails
New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election
Anxiety

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

July 13, 2025

Among young adults, stress from election news was linked to higher risks of depression and anxiety, while pre-election anticipatory stress was linked to depression only. Stress about the election outcome was not associated with either condition.

Read moreDetails
Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
COVID-19

Frequent dreams and nightmares surged worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic

July 1, 2025

An international study of over 15,000 adults across 16 countries found that dream recall and nightmares became more common during the pandemic, with sleep duration, age, and gender all playing a role in how often people experienced them.

Read moreDetails
Troubling study shows “politics can trump truth” to a surprising degree, regardless of education or analytical ability
Donald Trump

Racial insecurity helped shield Trump from Republican backlash after Capitol riot, study suggests

June 18, 2025

Despite widespread condemnation of the January 6th attack, many white Republicans remained loyal to Trump—especially those who perceived anti-white discrimination. A new study shows how racial status threat can protect political leaders from the consequences of norm violations.

Read moreDetails
Some dark personality traits may help buffer against depression, new psychology research suggests
COVID-19

COVID-19 coverage linked to rise in anti-Asian sentiment, especially among Trump supporters

June 17, 2025

Americans became less favorable toward Asians as COVID-19 spread and news coverage intensified, according to a new study. The drop was strongest among Trump supporters, highlighting how political rhetoric and fear shaped public opinion during the pandemic.

Read moreDetails
Donald Trump’s presidency associated with significant changes in the topography of prejudice in the United States
Authoritarianism

Authoritarian beliefs predict whether voters see Trump or Clinton as psychopathic

June 4, 2025

Researchers found that voters’ authoritarian tendencies influenced how they judged the psychopathic traits of 2016 presidential candidates. Those high in authoritarianism were more likely to view Trump favorably and Clinton as psychologically disordered—and vice versa.

Read moreDetails
Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims
Donald Trump

Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims

June 2, 2025

Narcissism in political leaders may have roots in childhood. A recent study explores how Hitler, Putin, and Trump experienced similar emotional trauma and parenting styles that contributed to unhealthy narcissistic development and shaped their political personas.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Scientists identify the brain’s built-in brake for binge drinking

Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors

Childhood maltreatment linked to emotion regulation difficulties and teen mental health problems

Caffeine may help prevent depression-like symptoms by protecting the gut-brain connection

Secret changes to major U.S. health datasets raise alarms

Moral outrage spreads petitions online—but doesn’t always inspire people to sign them

The triglyceride-glucose index: Can it predict depression risk in the elderly?

People with ADHD exhibit altered brain activity before making high-stakes choices

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy