Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology Donald Trump

Trump provokes strong opinions among American adolescents, study finds — and they’re surprisingly well informed

by The Conversation
May 7, 2020
in Donald Trump, Racism and Discrimination
President Donald J. Trump listens to a reporter’s question during the coronavirus update briefing Monday, April 27, 2020, in the Rose Garden of the White House (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

President Donald J. Trump listens to a reporter’s question during the coronavirus update briefing Monday, April 27, 2020, in the Rose Garden of the White House (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Teenagers in the United States are informed about their political world and capable of effectively evaluating political leaders, including President Donald Trump.

This statement runs counter to stereotypes that adults tend to hold about teens. Ask most adults to describe the political abilities of the typical American adolescent and you may hear words like “apathetic,” “uninformed” and “immature.”

But a study I conducted in 2017 with Laura-Wray Lake of UCLA, Amy Syvertsen of the Search Institute and two of my graduate students, Lauren Alvis and Katelyn Romm, indicates that high school students are much more knowledgeable – and have stronger feelings – about their political world than they are usually given credit for.

We asked more than 1,400 high school students in grades 9 to 12 to evaluate President Trump and provide reasons for their approval or disapproval of the president. The teenagers came from Southern California near Los Angeles, suburban Minnesota and rural West Virginia. They were diverse – 43% identified as Latino, 34% as white, 13% as African American and 6% as Asian American – and lived in communities that support and oppose Trump.

A wide range of views

Several key themes emerged from the responses.

One was enthusiasm. Teens had a lot to say about Trump. Both youth who approved of Trump and those who did not provided thoughtful reasons for their views of the president. Many youth wrote sophisticated responses that counter stereotypes of adolescents as indifferent to their political world.

Another theme was knowledge. Teens supported their views by pointing to specific policies or statements by the president. Many of them justified their opinions by mentioning Trump’s policies on social and political issues such as economic policy, abortion and relationships with foreign countries.

A large percentage of teens mentioned immigration, pointing to specific Trump statements or policy proposals, like the construction of a border wall between the United States and Mexico.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

An 18-year-old female, for example, expressed her approval of Trump’s immigration policies: “Regarding issues with immigrants and stuff, I am not completely against it. I think we should be more aware of who and what kind of people we are allowing into our country, to keep everyone safe.”

A 15-year-old white female had this to say about Trump’s border policies: “I just don’t understand how that would make us great again. Because America is made up of immigrants, so it wouldn’t be America if he didn’t allow immigrants.”

Teenagers also demonstrated knowledge of the president’s leadership style and background. Many of them mentioned Trump’s business portfolio or his extensive Twitter use as a communication tool.

“I feel that [Trump] will bring more jobs to the economy since he is a businessman,” said a 17-year-old Latina.

On the other hand, youth who disapproved of Trump pointed to his lack of political experience.

Strong beliefs

Political beliefs varied greatly among adolescents, with many teens expressing strong approval or disapproval of the president in a way that echoed the range of views we see among adult voters.

“Trump is going to do many things such as lower taxes, repeal Obamacare and try to institute the travel ban,” wrote an 18-year-old white male. “He also is not going to be a gun control freak.”

A 17-year-old African American female said: “I give [Trump] some credit because he is against abortion and gay marriage.”

By contrast, a 15-year-old white female from Minnesota wrote: “President Trump is a climate change denier. He also is in support of ‘defending the Second Amendment,’ which I also believe in. However, I also understand that gun violence is rampant in the United States and needs to be regulated more heavily.”

Bashing stereotypes

The responses we gathered help counter another stereotype about American adolescents: that they are overwhelmingly liberal and likely to vote for Democratic candidates.

Yes, younger generations lean more liberal on some social and political issues compared to older generations. But our study indicates that it’s inaccurate to generalize about teens’ political inclinations, because they hold a full range of views.

Teen views of Trump, like those of adults, were strongly related to where they live. Overwhelming majorities of adolescents in Southern California (85%) and Minnesota (84%) disapproved of Trump, but a majority of youth in West Virginia held positive views (66%). Adolescents with more conservative parents were more likely to approve of Trump, while youth from more liberal homes more strongly disapproved of the president. White youth generally held more favorable views of Trump, while females and black and Latino youth tended to reject him.

Personal stake

Our study also helps counter the notion that adolescents are not directly affected by political activity, that they have “no skin in the game.”

Adolescents in rural West Virginia underlined how Trump’s energy policies could directly affect family members employed by power plants or coal mines. This is how one 14-year-old white female put it: “I am happy Donald Trump is our president because my dad works for a power company, and that is how we made the majority of our money. Without his job we would have a hard time buying medicines and taking care of everyone in my family.”

Many teen Trump skeptics from Southern California noted how his proposed immigration policies could threaten their families or neighborhoods. A 15-year-old Latina, for instance, noted: “I am very scared [Trump] will harm my family. My parents are not from this country, but they do the best they can to be here with us and have us live the American dream.”

Sensitivity to discrimination

One final theme present in our study highlights issues that will weigh on younger voters in the 2020 election and beyond. A large percentage of responses were framed around issues of racism, sexism and homophobia. Over half of the youth who dismiss Trump viewed his policies as potentially biased or loaded with discriminatory rhetoric, which is consistent with data indicating that younger generations are more attuned to issues of equity.

These concerns were not limited to any one group of teens. For example, an 18-year-old white male from West Virginia said, “[Trump] is misogynistic and sexually offensive as audio clips of Donald Trump would prove more than once … going as far to make fun of a disabled man in front of national television.”

As this response shows, teenagers are more politically informed and opinionated than is usually assumed. This should encourage parents and teachers to engage teens in political discussion and anticipate that they will be able to effectively share informed views.

Additionally, our findings may be interesting to several U.S. districts mulling whether to lower the voting age from 18 to 16.

At very least, this study may help to counter concerns that youth don’t care or will arrive at polls uninformed.

[You’re too busy to read everything. We get it. That’s why we’ve got a weekly newsletter. Sign up for good Sunday reading. ]The Conversation

By Aaron Metzger, Associate Professor of Psychology, West Virginia University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Previous Post

Home confinement during COVID-19 puts children at risk for symptoms of anxiety and depression, study suggests

Next Post

New “Obsession with COVID-19 Scale” identifies psychologically disordered thinking about the coronavirus

RELATED

Women who are open to “sugar arrangements” tend to show deeper psychological vulnerabilities
Racism and Discrimination

Watching violent Black video game characters increases unconscious bias in White viewers

March 14, 2026
A single Trump tweet has been connected to a rise in arrests of white Americans
Donald Trump

Texas migrant buses boosted Donald Trump’s vote share in targeted cities

March 12, 2026
New psychology research sheds light on the mystery of deja vu
Political Psychology

Black Lives Matter protests sparked a short-term conservative backlash but ultimately shifted the 2020 election towards Democrats

March 9, 2026
Scientists discover psychedelic drug 5-MeO-DMT induces a state of “paradoxical wake”
Business

Black employees struggle to thrive under managers perceived as Trump supporters

March 4, 2026
The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures
Donald Trump

Donald Trump gained 2024 votes in areas where inflation was worse, study finds

February 25, 2026
What scientists found when they analyzed 187 of Donald Trump’s shrugs
Donald Trump

Donald Trump’s 2024 election win increased the social acceptability of prejudice, study suggests

February 24, 2026
Trump support in 2024 linked to White Americans’ perception of falling to the bottom of the racial hierarchy
Donald Trump

Trump support in 2024 linked to White Americans’ perception of falling to the bottom of the racial hierarchy

February 17, 2026
The psychological puzzle of Donald Trump: Eye-opening findings from 20 studies
Donald Trump

Donald Trump is fueling a surprising shift in gun culture, new research suggests

February 14, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Why mobile game fail ads make you want to download the app
  • The science of sound reduplication and cuteness in product branding
  • How consumers react to wait time predictions from humans versus AI chatbots
  • The psychology of persuasion: When to use a friendly face versus a competent expert
  • How CEO narcissism shapes company strategy

LATEST

Using AI to verify human advice could damage your professional relationships

Brain scans reveal a bipolar-like link to childhood trauma in some depressed patients

Outdoor athletes show superior color detection in their peripheral vision

Narcissistic traits and celebrity worship are linked to excessive Instagram scrolling via emotional struggles and fear of missing out

Neuroticism is linked to altered communication between the brain’s emotional networks

A massive review reveals cannabis falls short in treating psychiatric disorders

Artificial intelligence struggles to consistently evaluate scientific facts

New brain scanning method safely tracks how Alzheimer’s drugs work in living patients

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc