Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology Donald Trump

Trump’s attacks on voting by mail have global implications, new research suggests

by Eric W. Dolan
September 17, 2024
in Donald Trump
Donald Trump speaking with supporters at an "An Address to Young Americans" in 2020. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Donald Trump speaking with supporters at an "An Address to Young Americans" in 2020. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

A recent study published in Public Opinion Quarterly suggests that the skepticism surrounding mail-in voting, heavily popularized during Donald Trump’s 2020 U.S. presidential campaign, may have influenced Canadians’ attitudes toward their own mail-in voting process. Researchers found that Canadians with populist, particularly right-wing, views were more likely to distrust mail-in voting. This study sheds light on how political narratives from one country can affect attitudes in another, even when those narratives are based on false claims.

Trump repeatedly criticized mail-in voting in the lead-up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, claiming that it would lead to widespread fraud. Trump suggested that mail-in voting would be “substantially fraudulent” and described it as a system that could be easily manipulated, with ballots allegedly being forged, stolen, or fraudulently signed. He emphasized concerns about “unsolicited” ballots, referring to states sending out ballots to voters who had not specifically requested them, and claimed this could lead to chaos and a “rigged election.”

Despite these assertions, multiple fact-checking organizations and election experts have found little to no evidence to support these claims, and courts dismissed numerous lawsuits challenging the integrity of mail-in voting.

The motivation behind the new study was to investigate whether this rhetoric, particularly Trump’s claims about mail-in voting fraud, had an influence beyond the United States. With Canadians closely following U.S. news, the researchers aimed to explore how political discourse in the U.S. could affect public trust in democratic processes in neighboring countries like Canada.

“I have a long-standing research interest in public opinion, political trust, and issues that relate to democracy,” said study author Cary Wu, a York Research Chair and Associate Professor of Sociology at York University. “People’s trust in elections is critical to democracy. If people have no trust, they are less likely to come out and vote. Low trust in elections could also lead to political riots, as demonstrated by the January 6 United States Capitol attack in the United States. The increased use of mail-in voting, after the pandemic, and in the future in Canada, underscores the need to consider whether people perceive it to be as trustworthy as in-person voting.”

To investigate this, the research team conducted an in-depth analysis of data collected from the 2021 Canadian Election Study, a long-standing national survey that gathers political opinions and behaviors from Canadians during election periods. The sample for this study included over 10,000 Canadian citizens, making it one of the most comprehensive datasets available for examining public opinion during the election.

The researchers examined several factors that could influence trust in mail-in voting. First, they measured participants’ political ideology, asking them where they placed themselves on a spectrum from left to right. To gauge populist attitudes, they used questions such as whether participants agreed with the statement that “politicians do not care about the people” or that “ordinary people, not politicians, should make the most important policy decisions.”

The study also looked at participants’ exposure to political news, with particular emphasis on the consumption of U.S. media. The researchers explored whether those who consumed more political news, including U.S. sources, were more likely to be influenced by the narratives around mail-in voting popularized by Trump. In addition, the researchers conducted a separate analysis of respondents from Quebec, where French is the dominant language, to see if the impact of U.S. media was less pronounced.

The study confirmed that Canadians with right-wing populist views were indeed more likely to distrust mail-in voting. This group expressed significantly less confidence in the reliability of mail-in ballots, even though the Canadian electoral system has a long history of successful mail-in voting with few reported issues.

“Our analysis suggests that Canadians holding populist views—and, in particular, those holding right-wing populist views (would-be Trump supporters)—are less trusting of voting by mail,” Wu told PsyPost.

One of the key drivers behind this distrust appeared to be exposure to political news, particularly from U.S. sources. The study found that Canadians who frequently engaged with political news were more likely to exhibit skepticism toward mail-in voting if they also held populist views. This media exposure amplified the effect, suggesting that narratives from the U.S. had a measurable impact on how some Canadians viewed their own electoral process.

Interestingly, in Quebec, where French-language media dominates and where there is less direct exposure to U.S. news, the influence of political news on attitudes toward mail-in voting was significantly weaker. This further supports the idea that media narratives from the U.S. contributed to the skepticism seen in English-speaking Canada.

Overall, the researchers concluded that Trump’s claims about mail-in voting fraud had crossed the border, shaping public opinion among right-wing populists in Canada. Despite the lack of evidence for widespread fraud in both countries’ mail-in voting systems, the political and media discourse in the U.S. had an observable influence on Canadian views.

“Donald Trump’s attacks on voting by mail have global implications,” Wu said. “It lowers people’s trust in voting by mail in the United States and in Canada, as we have shown, and probably in other parts of the world as well.”

While this study provides evidence of a “Trump effect” in Canada, there are limitations to the research. First, the data used in the study were collected during the 2021 federal election, so it is difficult to compare whether Canadians’ views on mail-in voting had shifted significantly since before the 2020 U.S. election. Ideally, the researchers would have had data from earlier elections to establish a clear baseline of trust in mail-in voting among right-wing populists.

Additionally, while the researchers controlled for political ideology, they were unable to directly measure the impact of specific news sources, such as which U.S. networks or websites were most influential in spreading mistrust. Future research could benefit from a more detailed analysis of the role that individual media outlets play in shaping public opinion in Canada.

Looking forward, the researchers suggest that further studies could examine how other political narratives from the U.S. affect Canadian public opinion. For example, future research could explore whether other claims about election integrity, public health measures, or immigration have polarized Canadians in the same way that Trump’s rhetoric about mail-in voting did. The close relationship between Canada and the U.S. offers a unique opportunity to study how political discourse in one country can influence public opinion in another.

“I am interested in looking how other political/false claims from the Southern border can polarize Canadians,” Wu said.

The study, “The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada,” was authored by Cary Wu and Andrew Dawson.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails
Troubling study shows “politics can trump truth” to a surprising degree, regardless of education or analytical ability
Donald Trump

Racial insecurity helped shield Trump from Republican backlash after Capitol riot, study suggests

June 18, 2025

Despite widespread condemnation of the January 6th attack, many white Republicans remained loyal to Trump—especially those who perceived anti-white discrimination. A new study shows how racial status threat can protect political leaders from the consequences of norm violations.

Read moreDetails
Donald Trump’s presidency associated with significant changes in the topography of prejudice in the United States
Authoritarianism

Authoritarian beliefs predict whether voters see Trump or Clinton as psychopathic

June 4, 2025

Researchers found that voters’ authoritarian tendencies influenced how they judged the psychopathic traits of 2016 presidential candidates. Those high in authoritarianism were more likely to view Trump favorably and Clinton as psychologically disordered—and vice versa.

Read moreDetails
Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims
Donald Trump

Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims

June 2, 2025

Narcissism in political leaders may have roots in childhood. A recent study explores how Hitler, Putin, and Trump experienced similar emotional trauma and parenting styles that contributed to unhealthy narcissistic development and shaped their political personas.

Read moreDetails
A single Trump tweet has been connected to a rise in arrests of white Americans
Authoritarianism

New study helps explain rising Trump support among minority voters

May 29, 2025

The belief that only conservatives prefer authoritarian leaders is upended by new research showing ethnic minorities—regardless of political affiliation—are more supportive of strong leadership than White liberals. The study suggests generalized trust is a key psychological factor.

Read moreDetails
Trump’s election fraud allegations linked to temporary decline in voter turnout
Donald Trump

Trump assassination attempt lowered Republican support for violence and boosted party unity

February 17, 2025

The attempted assassination of Trump didn’t ignite partisan fury—instead, Republicans became less supportive of political violence and more united, while Democrats’ attitudes remained unchanged.

Read moreDetails
The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures
Donald Trump

The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures

February 6, 2025

Ever noticed Donald Trump's frequent pointing? A new linguistic study reveals it's not just random.

Read moreDetails
Victimhood and Trump’s Big Lie: New study links white grievance to election skepticism
Dark Triad

Donald Trump viewed as higher in Dark Tetrad traits than Joe Biden, study finds

February 5, 2025

A study on the 2020 U.S. election examined how perceived dark tetrad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism) in Trump and Biden influenced voter behavior. Perceptions varied by political affiliation and impacted candidate support, with psychopathy and sadism decreasing it.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

Inside the bored brain: Unlocking the power of the default mode network

Choline imbalance in the brain linked to with cognitive symptoms in young depression patients

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

Sedentary time linked to faster brain aging in older adults, study finds

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

New study uncovers a surprising effect of cold-water immersion

Being adopted doesn’t change how teens handle love and dating

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy