Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

Psychologists argue we’re not as choosy about romantic partners as we think

by Eric W. Dolan
January 6, 2022
in Relationships and Sexual Health, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

There is a wealth of research that suggests humans are more biased toward beginning, advancing, and maintaining romantic relationships than they realize, according to a new article published in Personality and Social Psychology Review. Rather than being highly selective, people appear to have a tendency to push relationships forward, even when things are not going well.

“I’ve been studying relationship decisions for about a decade,” said Western University assistant professor Samantha Joel. “I’m interested in romantic relationships because they are a very emotionally charged aspect of people’s lives, and I’m interested in decisions because they give people agency. What can people actively do to improve their own relationship outcomes? Are there ways to help people choose partners who are better for them, or build relationships that are better for them?”

“As I’ve been studying these decisions, I’ve repeatedly noticed this pattern where, when people are faced with a relational fork in the road, the path that leads to a long-term relationship seems easier than the path that leads to singlehood. The goal of this paper was to systematically consider that thesis.”

Joel and her co-author Geoff MacDonald reviewed the scientific literature on the formation and maintenance of romantic relationships. They noted that people are not particularly selective when choosing a partner. A large speed-dating study, for instance, found that participants said yes to an average of 40% of their dating options. Research has also found that people tend to overestimate their willingness to reject potential partners who have expressed an interest in them, even if they have some undesirable traits.

Falling in love is not particularly rare, either. Instead people have a tendency become rapidly attached to their partners. “For example, in one classic study, single undergraduate students were recruited and their experiences of falling in love were tracked over the course of a semester (Aron et al., 1995),” the researchers explained. “Of the undergraduate students recruited for the two longitudinal studies, 33% of participants in Study 1 fell in love over the course of a 12-week period.”

Deciding to leaving an established relationship, meanwhile, appears to be especially difficult for many people, even when the relationship is abusive. People often experience guilt and other negative emotions when they do make the decision to break up with a partner.

“Even after a relationship is dissolved, the breakup does not always ‘stick.’ On-again/off-again relationships are common, whereby a relationship dissolves and renews, often repeatedly,” the researchers noted.

“The main argument of the paper is that, as a rule, people very much want to wind up in a long-term relationship, and so our judgment and decision-making tendencies seem to be calibrated toward that goal,” Joel told PsyPost. “Decisions that move a relationship forward tend to feel like default options — the easy options — whereas decisions that forgo romantic opportunities or reject romantic partners feel a lot more challenging.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Relationships, of course, are complex and influenced by a countless number of factors.

“This paper puts forth a broad thesis that no doubt has many boundary conditions,” Joel said. “In the paper, we consider the possibility that highly physically attractive people can afford to be choosier about romantic partners (mixed evidence), and that women are choosier than men (mixed evidence).”

“The data we are drawing from are also limited in a number of important ways, in that relationship science, like psychology more broadly, tends to greatly oversample cis, white, affluent, non-disabled Western participants (e.g., Williamson et al., 2021),” Joel added.

“The Western courtship process looks very different from that of much of the world, where families tend to play a bigger role in mate selection. Further, the same marginalized groups who tend to face barriers to dating (e.g., stigma on dating apps) are also notably absent from our samples. Obtaining more diverse samples, both within and outside North America, is a crucial future direction for our field.”

The review article, “We’re Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships“, was published July 10, 2021.

Previous Post

Science skepticism appears to be an important predictor of non-compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place policies

Next Post

Gifted and non-gifted individuals differ in openness to experience, but not other Big Five personality traits

RELATED

Scientists use “dream engineering” to boost creative problem-solving during REM sleep
Psychopathy

People with psychopathic traits don’t lack fear—they actually enjoy it

March 10, 2026
Scientists identify a fat-derived hormone that drives the mood benefits of exercise
Artificial Intelligence

Therapists test an AI dating simulator to help chronically single men practice romantic skills

March 9, 2026
New psychology research sheds light on the mystery of deja vu
Political Psychology

Black Lives Matter protests sparked a short-term conservative backlash but ultimately shifted the 2020 election towards Democrats

March 9, 2026
Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy
Neuroimaging

Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy

March 9, 2026
Democrats dislike Republicans more than Republicans dislike Democrats, studies find
Personality Psychology

Supportive relationships are linked to positive personality changes

March 8, 2026
New psychology research shows that hatred is not just intense anger
Social Psychology

New research sheds light on the psychological recipe for a grudge

March 8, 2026
What is virtue signaling? The science behind moral grandstanding
Definitions

What is virtue signaling? The science behind moral grandstanding

March 8, 2026
A psychological need for certainty is associated with radical right voting
Social Psychology

Apocalyptic views are surprisingly common among Americans and predict responses to existential hazards

March 7, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Genetic factors drive the link between cognitive ability and socioeconomic status

How viral infections disrupt memory and thinking skills

Everyday mental quirks like déjà vu might be natural byproducts of a resting mind

New analysis shows ideology, not science, drove the global prohibition of psychedelics

People with psychopathic traits don’t lack fear—they actually enjoy it

Scientists use “dream engineering” to boost creative problem-solving during REM sleep

Therapists test an AI dating simulator to help chronically single men practice romantic skills

Women with tattoos feel more attractive but experience the same body anxieties in the bedroom

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc