PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Rainbow profile filters on Facebook boost LGTBQ individuals’ sense of belonging but don’t appear to increase activism

by Beth Ellwood
November 13, 2020
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research suggests that the use of rainbow profile filters on Facebook enhances feelings of belonging in members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community. These filters, however, do not appear to spur related activism. These findings were published in Psychology of Women Quarterly.

In the United States, great strides have been made in the adoption of policies protecting LGBTQ rights, and in a fairly short amount of time.

“The growth of support for LGBTQ rights is arguably one of the fastest growing social movements in modern history . . . How did people’s attitudes toward LGBTQ people shift so quickly?” study authors Jes L. Matsick and colleagues question. “Although the answer may be multifaceted, widespread networking through technology, and the advancement of social media in particular, likely shifted public opinion and support for LGBTQ-focused causes (Ayoub, 2018).”

The researchers point to rainbow profile filters on Facebook as an example of “pictivism” — a simple form of activism whereby a user embeds a frame or watermark on their profile photo as a means of showing support for a cause. While the use of these profile filters is widespread, especially among women, it is unclear whether these displays of support effectively promote social change or whether they are perceived as inauthentic and “virtue signaling.”

Matsick and team conducted three studies to explore how rainbow profile filters are perceived and whether they have any effect on observers’ attitudes and behaviors.

Two studies had heterosexual women view invented Facebook profiles. Each subject viewed one of four experimental profiles that featured a photo depicting either a same-sex or a different-sex couple with either a rainbow profile filter or no filter. To keep the motives of the study discrete, the subjects also viewed two “filler” profiles.

Participants then completed a survey measuring sexual prejudice, perceived closeness to LGBTQ individuals, and their perception of the profile user’s activism. At the end of the survey, the subjects were told to imagine that they had $100 and asked how much of it they would be willing to donate to an LGBTQ cause.

In both studies, the profiles appeared to have a small effect on respondents’ feelings towards the LGBTQ community. In Study 1, participants who saw the queer profile showed lower hate when later assessed on the measure of sexual prejudice. In Study 2, subjects who saw the queer profile with the rainbow filter showed greater internalized affirmativeness and more closeness to LGBTQ individuals than those who saw the heterosexual profile using the rainbow filter.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Internalized affirmativeness referred to items that conveyed participants’ willingness to display an LGBTQ pride symbol or attend a public demonstration in support of LGBTQ rights; thus, exposure to queer women’s pictivism strengthens heterosexual people’s intentions for prosocial engagement,” Matsick and colleagues explain.

The researchers highlight that it was filter use by queer women that appeared to be influential in improving heterosexual observers’ attitudes towards the LGBTQ community.

“For heterosexual people,” the authors discuss, “having intergroup contact with queer people through their online visibility and having exposure to their online activism may be the most influential form of attitudinal change via social networks.”

Neither study, however, showed that the rainbow filters had an effect on ally behavior, as measured by subjects’ willingness to donate money to an LGBTQ cause.

A final study followed a similar design but was conducted among an LGBTQ sample instead of  a heterosexual sample. An interesting finding emerged — participants who saw the profiles with filters reported a greater sense of online belonging and societal cohesion than those who saw profiles without filters. This finding suggests that the rainbow filters provided feelings of belonging for LGBTQ observers that went beyond the online world and influenced their wider conception of society.

“Although filter use may be a low effort form of allyship and activism, the use of a rainbow pride filter on Facebook is quite influential for improving the online and societal well-being of LGBTQ people who are exposed to people’s use of it,” the authors conclude.

The study, “Facebook LGBTQ Pictivism: The Effects of Women’s Rainbow Profile Filters on Sexual Prejudice and Online Belonging”, was authored by Jes L. Matsick, Lizbeth M. Kim, and Mary Kruk.

(Image by Chickenonline from Pixabay)

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Women with high cognitive ability tend to be seen as more hostile by teammates and report more mistreatment
  • Why is autism increasing? Scientists are converging on an unglamorous answer
  • Social freedom shapes whose version of reality you adopt, new research suggests
  • Psychologists identify three distinct profiles of support for free speech
  • High smartphone dependency linked to altered time allocation in teens

Science of Money

  • Newly unearthed records rewrite the history of North America’s basic income experiments
  • How ideological shifts on the Supreme Court move the broader economy
  • What makes academic and nonprofit partnerships actually work
  • Spending crypto triggers more guilt than spending cash, study finds
  • How giving AI a personality changes the way consumers buy

Recent

  • People who are more considerate of others show less “me first” bias in quick decisions
  • People with darker personalities tend to prefer partners like themselves, study suggests
  • Your body’s state may shape whether your best ideas are verbal or visual
  • Brain connectivity patterns map onto sensory processing styles in autistic youth
  • Does loving horror make you psychologically tougher in a crisis? Not in war-torn Lebanon, study finds
  • Women’s attention to beauty isn’t limited to the sex they’re attracted to, eye-tracking study finds
  • Researchers identify female-specific and male-specific genetic risks for anxiety
  • People who score higher on intelligence tests tend to rate their own attractiveness slightly lower
  • A single dose of psilocybin eased depression within days, but its edge over placebo faded within a year
  • Does medical transition help young transgender people’s mental health? A Finnish study sparks a battle over the answer

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc