Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Is sexting good or bad for you? Psychologists study the consequences of sending sexts

by Eric W. Dolan
July 11, 2017
in Social Psychology
(Photo credit: ASP Inc)

(Photo credit: ASP Inc)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Past research has found that more than eight out of 10 people are sexting. Now psychologists are investigating the positive and negative consequences of using your phone to send sexually suggestive or nude images of yourself.

The study, published in the scientific journal Computers in Human Behavior, found that sexts sent in casual relationships tend to have more negative outcomes — among other findings.

“In general, I am interested in the ways in which technology is affecting individuals and relationships,” explained the study’s corresponding author, Michelle Drouin of Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne.

“Much of my research has been devoted to the ways in which technology is affecting romantic relationships, and sexting emerged quickly as a worthy topic of study. With regard to this particular paper, although we now have an ever-growing base of scientific studies on sexting, we are still missing information about the benefits and detriments of sexting within different types of romantic relationships.”

Drouin and her colleagues found that 58% of college students admitted to sending a sext and 62% admitted to receiving one. Most began sexting as minors. Men were more likely to report that their last sexting partner was a casual partner, while women were more likely to report their last sexting partner was a committed partner.

About half of the participants who had sexted reported that it resulted in positive sexual or emotional consequences, but a large number of participants also reported negative consequences.

“People may be motivated to send sexually-explicit picture or video messages to their romantic partner because they think it is fun or flirtatious or they want to please their partners. In fact, when we ask them, these are young adults’ most commonly cited motivations for sexting,” Drouin explained to PsyPost.

“However, many people experience regret or worry about the pictures they have sent to recent partners, and some even report discomfort and trauma at the time they sent the pictures. Most importantly, women and those who send these sexual images to casual sex partners report fewer relationship benefits (emotional or sexual) and more relationship detriments associated with the sexting than those who send them to committed partners.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

The findings are based on 352 undergraduate students who completed an online survey. The younger research sample makes it difficult to generalize to older populations.

“Most of the sexting research examines sexting practices of teens and young adults, who are, for the most part, in relationships that are not life-long commitments,” Drouin remarked. “We still do not know whether couples perceive these sexually-explicit messages to be beneficial to married or other long-term committed relationships.”

“Additionally, we are just starting to ask questions about whether navigating sexual (and social) relationships online is having an effect on the way we develop and function in later stages of our lives. I think this is the next critical step in technology-mediated communication research.”

“Sexual communication is just one of the many facets of life that has been affected by technology,” Drouin added. “Unfortunately, the technology changes more quickly than we can study its effects, which means that the field is always vast, and the questions are always many.”

The study, “Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends…“, was also co-authored by Manda Coupe and Jeff Temple. It was published online June 14, 2017.

Previous Post

The openness of a floor plan could affect how much you eat, study suggests

Next Post

Study finds your genes have a large influence your sense of duty to vote

RELATED

Psychology researchers identify a “burnout to extremism” pipeline
Narcissism

Narcissistic traits are linked to a brain area governing emotional control

April 12, 2026
Albumin and cognitive decline: Common urine test may help predict dementia risk
Neuroimaging

Reduced gray matter and altered brain connectivity are linked to problematic smartphone use

April 12, 2026
Scientists just found a novel way to uncover AI biases — and the results are unexpected
Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence makes consumers more impatient

April 11, 2026
Weird disconnect between gender stereotypes and leader preferences revealed by new psychology research
Business

When the pay gap is wide, women see professional beauty as a strategic asset

April 11, 2026
Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests
Social Psychology

Drumming with friends increases oxytocin levels in children, study finds

April 11, 2026
Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests
Donald Trump

Cognitive dissonance helps explain why Trump supporters remain loyal, new research suggests

April 11, 2026
Sniffing women’s tears reduces aggression in men and alters brain activity, groundbreaking study finds
Evolutionary Psychology

Crying during a conflict damages your opponent’s reputation at a cost to your own

April 11, 2026
Too many choices at the ballot box has an unexpected effect on voters, study suggests
Political Psychology

Conservative 2024 campaigns reframed demographic shifts as an election integrity issue

April 10, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds
  • Should your marketing tell a story or state the facts? A massive meta-analysis has answers
  • When brands embrace diversity, some customers pull away — and new research explains why
  • Smaller influencers drive engagement while bigger ones drive purchases, meta-analysis finds
  • Political conservatives are more drawn to baby-faced product designs, and purity values explain why

LATEST

Bladder toxicity risk appears low for psychiatric ketamine patients, though data is limited

Low doses of LSD alter emotional brain responses in people with mild depression

Narcissistic traits are linked to a brain area governing emotional control

Can video games make kids feel better about their bodies?

Reduced gray matter and altered brain connectivity are linked to problematic smartphone use

Your breathing pattern is as unique as a fingerprint

Extreme athletes just helped scientists unlock a deep evolutionary secret about human survival

How different negative emotions change the size of your pupils

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc