Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Study finds people overestimate their own country’s contribution to World War II

by Eric W. Dolan
October 2, 2019
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

New research has uncovered “striking differences” in how people from 11 different countries remember World War II. The study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that people tend to ascribe an inflated weight to their country’s contribution to the war effort.

“Years ago, my colleague Jim Wertsch (who has spent quite a bit of time in Russia) told me that Russians had a completely different narrative about World War II than the one I grew up with,” said lead author Henry Roediger, a professor in the psychological and brain sciences department at Washington University in St. Louis.

“I knew the ‘we won World War II’ saga that my father, my history books, American movies and novels, told me about. Then I started reading up on Russia (or the Soviet Union) and how they see the war.”

“It’s a quite different perspective and quite defensible! Of course, the war was won by all the allies, in combination, and it is hard to separate out exactly who should be credited with the victory (or we should just say the major allies should be credited with the victory),” Roediger explained.

“That was the genesis of our cross-national study, although it took years to pull it off.”

The researchers surveyed 1,338 adults from eight of the former Allied powers — Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand, Russia (as a proxy for the former Soviet Union), the United Kingdom, and the United States — and from three former Axis powers — Germany, Italy, and Japan.

They asked participants from the Allied countries, “In terms of percentage, what do you think was [your country’s] contribution to the victory in World War II?”

On the other hand, they asked participants from the Axis countries, “Germany, Italy, and Japan fought on the same side for 6 years during World War 2. What percentage of the war effort was provided by [your country]?”

Participants from three Allied countries — Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States — assigned more than 50% of the victory to their own country’s efforts. Russians claimed 75%, the U.K. respondents claimed 51%, and those from the U.S. claimed 54%. Across all eight Allied countries, the total effort added up to more than 300%.

Despite their defeat, participants from the Axis countries showed a similar pattern. Germans claimed 64% of the war effort, Japanese assigned themselves 47% of the effort, and Italians said they were responsible for 29% — a total of 140%.

“The United States has a particular viewpoint on all international events, although we do not think of it as our viewpoint; we think of it as ‘the truth,'” Roediger told PsyPost.

“However, people of other nations can have strongly diverging viewpoints — and can defend them well. We need to understand how other nations view the world, too, rather than simply assuming that our view of events represents the truth and anyone who does not believe our narrative is simply misguided.”

The participants were also asked to rank how much each country contributed to the Allied victory of World War 2. When the question was reframed in this way, most participants did rate their country’s contribution lower than in the first question.

U.S. participants dropped their estimate from 54% to 37%, but Russian participants lowered their estimates by just 11%.

The Soviet Union suffered an estimated 9,750,000 military deaths in World War II, compared to 416,800 U.S. military deaths. But participants outside of Russia tended to minimize Soviet contributions relative to American contributions.

“We found, as Wertsch had predicted, that Russians and Americans had profoundly different views about the major events of the war and about ‘who won the war.’ A surprise was that all 9 other countries we surveyed generally shared the American view of the war,” Roediger said.

“Why should the Chinese, Russia’s ally for many years after the war, subscribe to the American narrative rather than the Russian/Soviet narrative? Another question for future research.”

It’s also not the first time researchers have observed an unrealistic belief in the greatness of one’s country. A previous study of 6,185 students from 35 countries found that people tended to overestimate their country’s contribution to world history.

The study, “Competing national memories of World War II“, was authored by Henry L. Roediger III, Magdalena Abel, Sharda Umanath, Ruth A. Shaffer, Beth Fairfield, Masanobu Takahashi, and James V. Wertsch.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Psychopathic tendencies may be associated with specific hormonal patterns
Psychopathy

Psychopathic tendencies may be associated with specific hormonal patterns

July 10, 2025

What if the roots of psychopathy could be traced in our blood? New research is looking beyond psychology and into our endocrine system. A new study suggests hormones like cortisol and testosterone may hold important clues to a person's manipulative and impulsive tendencies.

Read moreDetails
Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds
Political Psychology

Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds

July 10, 2025

What if the key to swaying a swing voter lies in their biology? New research found giving testosterone to weakly affiliated Democratic men made them less loyal to their party and more open to Republicans, revealing a potential hormonal link to political persuasion.

Read moreDetails
Bullshit is deemed more credible if attributed to a scientist, compared to a spiritual guru
Social Psychology

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

July 8, 2025

A new study of Nobel Prize winners suggests that scientists who change locations or work in multiple places tend to begin their groundbreaking research earlier, highlighting how exposure to diverse environments may help spark innovative, high-impact ideas.

Read moreDetails
The most popular dementia videos on TikTok tend to have the lowest quality, study find
Addiction

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

July 8, 2025

People who frequently use short-video apps like TikTok may show reduced loss sensitivity and impulsive decision-making, according to a new neuroimaging study that links addictive use patterns to changes in brain activity during risky choices.

Read moreDetails
People with psychopathic traits fail to learn from painful outcomes
Narcissism

National narcissism linked to emotional impairments and dehumanization, new study finds

July 7, 2025

A new study suggests that people who see their nation as uniquely important often struggle with recognizing emotions and experience more anger and contempt—factors that may help explain why they’re more likely to dehumanize both outsiders and fellow citizens.

Read moreDetails
Anxious and avoidant attachment are elevated among individuals with eating disorders
Developmental Psychology

Personality may be a key factor connecting negative parenting experiences to adult challenges

July 7, 2025

New research finds a link between how adults recall being parented and their current life difficulties. These challenges may be partly explained by personality traits, such as lower conscientiousness, that are connected to early family environments and adult well-being.

Read moreDetails
Loneliness predicts an increase in TV viewing for older women, but not for men
Sexism

New study finds link between sexism and denial of male victimhood in relationships

July 6, 2025

New research shows that many people endorse myths that minimize abuse against men in relationships. These myths are closely tied to sexist attitudes about masculinity, gender roles, and who is believed to be a “real” victim of violence.

Read moreDetails
Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Dementia: Your lifetime risk may be far greater than previously thought

Psychopathic tendencies may be associated with specific hormonal patterns

Scientists use deep learning to uncover hidden motor signs of neurodivergence

Study finds “Anxious Mondays” linked to long-term stress and heart health risks in older adults

Adults treated with psychostimulants for ADHD show increased brain surface complexity, study finds

Is humor inherited? Twin study suggests the ability to be funny may not run in the family

Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds

Can sunshine make you happier? A massive study offers a surprising answer

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy