PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

Study of college students indicates men are still expected to pay the bill on first dates

by Mane Kara-Yakoubian
January 7, 2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A study published in the journal Psychological Reports found that traditional gender norms continue in dating culture, with men almost always paying the whole bill on first dates and paying more than women for subsequent dates – participants also held this expectation of men. Gender role attitudes had little to do with actual practice, but did influence payment expectations.

Heterosexual dating behavior is arguably quite gendered. Men and women may rely on their gender role concepts to guide how to behave in such situations. Women tend to assume a reactive or “gatekeeper” role in romantic relationships, while men adopt a more active role and initiate the first move. In the context of traditional dating, a man would be expected to ask out a woman, make plans, pay for expenses, and initiate any sexual interaction, whereas a woman’s role would be to accept or reject his advances.

Despite strong promotions of equality and diversity in the 21st century, with millennials witnessing these movements more so than any other generation, it is possible gender role differences persist in romantic dating. In this work, Hao Wu and colleagues explored sex differences in date payment, as well as expectations surrounding which partner ought to pay more.

A total of 552 heterosexual college students were recruited from a large, public, southeastern university in the United States. The overwhelming majority of participants (i.e., 97%) reported a yearly income of $25,000 USD or less. Approximately half the participants reported being currently single.

Participants completed a measure examining attitudes toward traditional masculinity, assessing for both machismo (e.g., characterized by aggressiveness) and caballerismo (e.g., characterized by chivalry). Participants also responded to items exploring attitudes toward women (e.g., “A woman should be free as a man to propose marriage”, “Women should worry less about their rights and more about becoming good wives and mothers”). Then, participants completed a shortened version of the Bem Sex Role inventory, exploring masculine and feminine traits (i.e., instrumentality vs. expressivity).

Lastly, participants responded to four sets of questions. The first set focused on payment experiences on the first date (e.g., “Who paid the bill for  your first date?”) while the second focused on questions relating to payment experiences on subsequent dates. The third and fourth sets assessed participants’ payment expectations (i.e., who should pay for the date) on the first and subsequent dates, respectively.

Wu and colleagues found that men almost always paid the entire bill on first dates and continued paying significantly more so in subsequent dates. On average, participants also expected men to pay more for both first and subsequent dates, though this effect was less pronounced among women. Men expected the male partner to pay on dates more so than women did. As well, “the more individuals embraced antifeminism and positive masculinity attitudes, the more they would expect the male partner to pay for first and subsequent dates.”

Women expected less payment from their partner for both the first and subsequent dates. So while women let their partner pay for date expenses, they tend to prefer a shared approach – particularly for subsequent dates. Further, regardless of gendered traits and attitudes, men tend to pay more for dates (particularly, the first).

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Overall, these findings reveal a gendered pattern in dating payment behaviors and expectations among millennials, suggesting that despite the continued support for egalitarianism in the workplace, many are returning to conventional ideologies regarding gender roles.

The authors note a few limitations. This research only retained heterosexual participants for analyses, and thus, cannot speak to payment norms or the role of gender attitudes on payment behaviors in non-heterosexual dating. As well, given data was collected in the southeast, it is possible that traditional southern culture influenced the results, limiting the generalizability of the current findings. Lastly, given the majority of participants were Caucasian and Christian (81% and 70% respectively), it is important to replicate these findings in a more diverse sample.

The study, “Gender Roles in the Millennium: Who Pays and Is Expected to Pay for Romantic Dates?”, was authored by Hao Wu, Shanhong Luo, Annelise Klettner, Tyler White, and Kate Albritton.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • New study explores the psychological chain behind involuntary sexual thoughts
  • Narcissistic individuals are more prone to problematic use of generative AI
  • Wealth and air pollution emerge as top predictors of state autism rates
  • Scientists develop a groundbreaking vaccine that outsmarts illicit fentanyl analogs
  • Trump’s 2020 pivot on face masks changed Republican behavior but not their medical beliefs

Science of Money

  • Does admitting a message is AI-written turn customers off? A new study weighs in
  • That “helpful” gift might backfire: self-improvement presents lead to bad reviews, study finds
  • The hidden language of packaging and why shoppers grant their approval
  • Screens on shopping carts nudge shoppers to spend more, even on items that aren’t on sale
  • Personality traits and social cues both feed crypto risk-taking, researchers report

Recent

  • Scientists discover a specific brainstem circuit that triggers long-lasting anxiety
  • Genetic risk for cannabis use disorder linked to brain differences in youth
  • A suspected bout of COVID-19 left a man with half his face numb and burning
  • Shared positive humor styles predict better online dating matches
  • Do you lose your whole day to one appointment? “Waiting mode” may be why
  • Adults with ADHD who struggle to manage emotions face a higher insomnia risk
  • People in close proximity to each other synchronize their heart rates
  • Oxytocin nasal spray may help people with borderline personality disorder engage in self-compassion meditation
  • Researchers identify risk factors for addictive use of cosmetic procedures
  • Study finds societal affluence is linked to wider gender gaps in STEM graduation

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc