Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

The link between winning elections and satisfaction with democracy is bigger for men than it is for women

by Eric W. Dolan
November 26, 2020
in Political Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

New research has found that electoral victory leads to a bigger boost in satisfaction with democracy for men than for women. The findings appear in the journal Electoral Studies.

“There is a lot of research showing that people who vote for victorious parties and candidates feel more positively about democracy, while the reverse is true of electoral losers. This is important, as democracies are stronger when seen as legitimate by the public,” said study author Shane P. Singh, a professor at the University of Georgia.

“There is also good reason to believe that men and women are affected differently by electoral victory. My coauthors, Neil Williams and Alexandra Snipes, and I wanted to investigate this.”

Using data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, the researchers found that people who voted for a victorious candidate tended to report being more satisfied with the way democracy works in their country than those who voted for the losing candidate. But the effect on of electoral victory on satisfaction with democracy was smaller for women than for men.

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems dataset includes nationally-representative post-election surveys from dozens of countries.

“The link between winning elections and satisfaction with democracy is bigger for men than it is for women. This is likely because men relish victory more due to gender-based differences in political socialization and because gender imbalances in political representation lead women to feel that they do not have as much ‘skin in the game,'” Singh told PsyPost.

When there was a higher percentage of women in the nation’s legislature, the researchers found there was a smaller gender gap in winner boosts in satisfaction with democracy.

But the study — like all research — includes some caveats.

“While the associations we detect are robust, this research was completely observational and based on post-election survey data, meaning we cannot be certain that the gender-based disparity in the impact of winning on satisfaction is not driven by some uncontrolled factors,” Singh explained.

The study, “Gender differences in the impact of electoral victory on satisfaction with democracy“, was published September 30, 2020.

(Photo credit: CityofStPete/Flickr)

RELATED

Autistic individuals and those with social anxiety differ in how they experience empathy, new study suggests
Political Psychology

Higher cognitive ability and other psychological factors predict support for free speech

September 17, 2025
Both-sidesism debunked? Study finds conservatives more anti-democratic, driven by two psychological traits
Authoritarianism

New paper unpacks how Trump uses “strategic victimhood” to justify retaliation

September 15, 2025
Artificial intelligence reveals Trump’s language as both uniquely simplistic and divisive among U.S. presidents
Political Psychology

Elite rhetoric about Trump’s prosecution had limited impact on Republican and independent voters

September 7, 2025
New research on political animosity reveals an “ominous” trend
Donald Trump

Researchers rushed to study the aftermath of the Trump shooting. Here’s what they found

September 3, 2025
Neuroscientists just rewrote our understanding of psychedelics with a groundbreaking receptor-mapping study
Political Psychology

Study finds partisan hostility drives protest participation in the United States

September 2, 2025
Trump’s speeches stump AI: Study reveals ChatGPT’s struggle with metaphors
Donald Trump

Trump shows signs of cognitive shift after 2024 shooting, study suggests

August 31, 2025
New research unravels the troubling link between polarization and attitude moralization
Political Psychology

Shock events in 2024 presidential campaign reversed typical online behavior, new study shows

August 29, 2025
It’s not social media: What’s really fueling Trump shooting conspiracies might surprise you
Conspiracy Theories

It’s not social media: What’s really fueling Trump shooting conspiracies might surprise you

August 27, 2025

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New research finds the cumulative weight of social hardship across a lifespan shapes the aging brain

U.S. sees 5.7 million more childless women than expected, fueling a “demographic cliff”

AI hate speech detectors show major inconsistencies, new study reveals

New study sheds light on how sexual self-disclosure relates to relationship quality

Brain scan study connects parahippocampal cortex thinning with depression and neuroticism

People experiencing manic episodes have measurably higher skin temperatures

Higher cognitive ability and other psychological factors predict support for free speech

Autistic individuals and those with social anxiety differ in how they experience empathy, new study suggests

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy