PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology Donald Trump

Voter personality predicted support for Donald Trump in the 2016 GOP primaries, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
April 29, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Donald Trump speaking at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Donald Trump speaking at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Donald Trump secured early support from voters with a particular set of personality traits, according to a new study published in American Politics Research.

The researchers were interested in better understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying Trump’s success in the Republican presidential primaries. They examined the Big Five model of personality in particular.

“We were interested in how candidate Trump was able to carve out such a large and stable portion of the Republican primary electorate so early in the race. If one thinks back to the early portion of the primary, there were dramatic fluctuations in the popularity of the other candidates,” said David Fortunato, Matthew V. Hibbing, and Jeffery J. Mondak — the authors of the study.

“From July of 2015 Bush, Walker, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz all polled in second place at one point or another, and Rubio, Carson, Cruz, and Kasich all polled at 20% support or greater at one point in the contest. All the while, Trump’s support never fell below 20% and climbed fairly steadily as his competitors withdrew from the contest.”

“In retrospect, the stability of his early support, in contrast to the instability of his competitors’ support, may have contributed substantially to his credibility with the primary electorate.”

“A second reason we were interested in this topic was because accounts in the popular press consistently discussed Trump’s appeal in terms of his personality and the way those characteristics resonated with voters,” the researchers told PsyPost.

“Narratives like this often are accepted with minimal scrutiny and we wanted to see whether there was an empirical basis for the speculation. In this case, the conventional wisdom appears to have been generally accurate.”

The researchers examined data from 1,132 Republicans who completed a survey around the time of the Iowa caucuses in 2016. They found that Trump had the greatest appeal among those who were high in conscientiousness and extraversion, and low in openness, agreeableness, and neuroticism.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

This was true even after the researchers controlled for the potential effects of gender, education, race, age, income, and ideology.

“One contributing factor for the stability and vigor of Trump’s early supporting coalition in the Republican primary was how well his messaging resonated with voters with particular personality traits,” the researchers explained. “Low agreeableness, low openness, low neuroticism, high extraversion, and high conscientiousness among voters not only predict favorability toward Trump, but also preferring Trump to his competitors in the primary.”

“It is also interesting to note that personality traits were not terribly important in predicting support for any of the other candidates in the race. This is one of many ways that Trump’s candidacy was unique. Trump’s primary campaign focused largely on his personal attributes, including his personality. That focus, in turn, brought the personal traits of voters into play.”

The findings provide new insights into early Trump supporters, but do not necessarily apply to all the Americans who voted for Trump in the presidential election.

“It is important to note, however, that this pattern holds for early support only. Once Trump wins the primary, voters identifying as Republican fell in line and the differences across personality types began to dissipate,” the authors of the study said. “That means that by the election in November, Trump support included people who were drawn to him early on the basis of personality as well as a large segment of voters who supported him for other reasons (e.g. partisan loyalty, lack of enthusiasm for the Democratic candidate).”

The study was titled: “The Trump Draw: Voter Personality and Support for Donald Trump in the 2016 Republican Nomination Campaign“.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Kids’ aggression appears to shape parents’ discipline more than the reverse, study finds
  • One in three teen boys follows Andrew Tate at least a little, and those who do hold more rigid views of manhood
  • Neuroscientists uncover brain clues to why some people with childhood trauma struggle to look forward to things
  • How chronic drinking masks the brain’s hidden scars from childhood trauma
  • A bigger paycheck tends to come with personality changes, according to a large-scale analysis of psychology research

Science of Money

  • Does remote work increase birth rates? Census data points to the opposite
  • France cut the workweek to 35 hours to boost hiring, but new research suggests it failed
  • The hidden psychology behind pro-company misconduct
  • Feeling buried in debt hurts living standards more than the actual math
  • California’s proposed billionaire tax could cost the state billions more than it raises

Recent

  • American Catholics reported a greater sense of meaning in life after Pope Leo XIV’s election, study finds
  • When politicians echo white replacement theory, extremist activity rises
  • College-educated people aren’t Big Tech’s biggest fans. They’re its most conflicted, study suggests
  • Chest vibrations paired with meditation appears to alter brain wiring in trauma survivors
  • Testosterone may help new brain cells survive, and timing could matter
  • People who believe conspiracy theories overestimate how many others agree, new research finds
  • Sugar restriction in early life is linked to lower dementia risk and slightly slower brain aging decades later
  • “AI psychosis” appears rare but real, and first-episode patients may be most vulnerable, study suggests
  • LSD pushes brain activity toward a more fractal, complex state, study finds
  • Race and gender are linked to how Americans protest and campaign

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc