When politicians echo white replacement theory, extremist activity rises

When political leaders publicly endorse white replacement conspiracy theories, their rhetoric is linked to measurable increases in real-world extremist activity. A recent analysis published in PLOS One shows that the repetition of these narratives by elected officials corresponds with upticks in white supremacist organizing. The research also highlights how such statements shape local public attention regarding immigration.

White replacement theories are false narratives claiming that a secretive group is orchestrating mass immigration to replace a nation’s native-born population. These ideological tropes have periodically resurfaced across Western countries over the last century. In the United States, these conspiracy theories often suggest that white Christian conservatives are being intentionally reduced to a demographic minority. Historically, these ideas were confined to fringe extremist groups trying to recruit members and justify hostilities.

Over the past decade, variations of these conspiracies have entered mainstream political discourse. Some politicians use explicit language about demographic replacement or foreign invasions. Others employ subtler versions of the narrative, alleging that left-leaning politicians are encouraging illegal immigration simply to secure future voters.

Sociologists Jack Gabriel Risien Wippell and Laura Dugan from The Ohio State University wanted to see if these political statements translate into tangible social consequences. The researchers designed a study to evaluate how political endorsements of these theories relate to both general public interest and extremist mobilization. They hypothesized that signaling from prominent leaders might create a sense of emboldenment among individuals holding prejudiced views. By normalizing hostile language, elites can lower the perceived social risks of collective action and make extreme ideas seem viable.

The researchers compiled a database of public statements made by federal and state legislators, as well as political candidates, between 2021 and 2023. They specifically isolated 25 endorsements of replacement theories that received coverage in major news outlets. To count as an endorsement, a statement had to reference immigration as a deliberate plot to replace a native population. By focusing on media-amplified statements, they ensured they were analyzing rhetoric that actually reached a broad audience.

Free daily newsletter

Wippell and Dugan first conducted a national analysis using weekly data spanning three years. They compared the timing and accumulation of the political endorsements against weekly Google Trends data for the topic of immigration. They also measured national extremist activity using data from the Anti-Defamation League, an open-source database compiled from news reports and government documents. This dataset provided a comprehensive record of white supremacist protests and public demonstrations.

At the national level, the researchers found a positive association between the accumulation of these political statements and subsequent white supremacist events. As media reports of politicians endorsing replacement narratives piled up, the frequency of extremist demonstrations increased across the country. The relationship between the political rhetoric and national Google searches for immigration was not statistically significant.

The research team then shifted their focus to a state-level analysis, evaluating the data on a monthly basis. They linked each political endorsement to the specific state represented by the politician making the claim. For this local analysis, they tracked state-level Google searches for immigration and expanded their extremist activity metrics to include the distribution of white supremacist propaganda.

Within individual states, the associations were distinct and robust. When state representatives endorsed replacement theories, their specific constituencies experienced an increase in both white supremacist events and propaganda distributions. The data indicates that local political environments play a highly influential role in community-level extremist behavior.

The state-level analysis also revealed a shift in general public attention. The accumulation of replacement theory endorsements by local politicians was tied to an increase in Google searches about immigration within their respective states. This suggests that politicians exert a stronger influence on the attention of their immediate constituents than on the broader national discourse.

The researchers note a few limitations regarding how the data captures media exposure. Tracking the exact public reach of a news story is incredibly difficult, as clips and quotes often spread virally through person-to-person communication and unmonitored social networks. The study treats media exposure as a flat metric between statements, which likely underestimates the true societal spread of the rhetoric.

The tools used to measure public attention also come with inherent caveats. Google Trends measures search interest for a topic relative to all other searches, rather than providing absolute search volumes. This means the data reflects proportional shifts in what the public is paying attention to within a limited attention economy.

Finally, the relationship between political statements and public attention might not be a one-way street. Supplementary analyses by the researchers suggest a bidirectional dynamic at the state level. While political endorsements might draw public focus toward immigration, politicians might also be reacting to rising public interest by increasing their use of these narratives.

The study, “Endorsing narratives of white replacement: Elite discourse, public attention, and extremist mobilization,” was authored by Jack Gabriel Risien Wippell and Laura Dugan.