Political Psychology

Research published in Injury Epidemiology suggests widespread extremist attitudes among military veterans are rare. While veterans are not broadly prone to political violence, the study notes that those who do radicalize remain highly dangerous.

A recent study shows that transporting migrants to cities far from the border amplified voters' fears about crime. This localized policy increased conservative turnout and pushed swing voters toward Donald Trump during the 2024 election.

New research shows the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests didn't just mobilize existing voters. By shifting public attitudes on racial inequality, the massive demonstrations significantly increased local Democratic support in the presidential election.

How we handle uncertainty might shape our politics. Research in Personality and Individual Differences indicates that a lower tolerance for ambiguity is associated with right-wing authoritarianism and populist attitudes, which tends to predict radical right voting.

A new study reveals that conservatives tend to view sustainable actions as less impactful than liberals do. This divide is driven by how uncommon these eco-friendly behaviors appear to be within their own political circles.

American political divisions surged between 2008 and 2020, but this trend is not happening globally. A new study in Royal Society Open Science uses machine learning to reveal how cultural issues drive these distinct political splits worldwide.

A recent study published in the journal Mindfulness suggests that treating oneself with kindness is linked to a preference for social equality. The research provides evidence that empathy bridges the gap between personal well-being and broader societal harmony.

New research provides evidence that active political participation mixed with election fraud conspiracy beliefs predicted support for the Capitol riots. The findings show how unverified narratives can push standard political engagement toward the justification of illegal acts.

A new study published in the Human Resource Management Journal shows that Black employees feel less included and less able to excel when their managers support Donald Trump. This effect is especially strong for younger workers.

Feed algorithms are not politically neutral. According to a recent study published in the journal Nature, using the algorithmic feed on X shifted users' political views toward conservative positions and permanently altered their online environment.

New research shows that changing how lawmakers discuss mass shootings has little effect on voter beliefs. Most Americans already support various firearm restrictions, and their entrenched views do not shift when politicians alter their public messaging.

New research suggests that people who endorse right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance are more likely to believe in the paranormal. This connection persists even when accounting for a person's tendency to rely on intuitive versus analytical thinking.

A new study suggests true AI neutrality is impossible. By analyzing how models describe political figures, scientists discovered that these systems align with the cultural and political values of their developers, often mirroring the worldview of their origin.

A new study finds that people who feel their lives bring value to society are significantly more likely to vote, volunteer, and donate to political causes than those who feel socially disconnected.

A new analysis bypasses subjective voter surveys to examine objective, county-level economic data. The research reveals that localized price increases for everyday necessities closely correlated with a shift toward the Republican candidate, especially in lower-income areas.