Political Psychology

New research provides evidence that active political participation mixed with election fraud conspiracy beliefs predicted support for the Capitol riots. The findings show how unverified narratives can push standard political engagement toward the justification of illegal acts.

A new study published in the Human Resource Management Journal shows that Black employees feel less included and less able to excel when their managers support Donald Trump. This effect is especially strong for younger workers.

Feed algorithms are not politically neutral. According to a recent study published in the journal Nature, using the algorithmic feed on X shifted users' political views toward conservative positions and permanently altered their online environment.

New research shows that changing how lawmakers discuss mass shootings has little effect on voter beliefs. Most Americans already support various firearm restrictions, and their entrenched views do not shift when politicians alter their public messaging.

New research suggests that people who endorse right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance are more likely to believe in the paranormal. This connection persists even when accounting for a person's tendency to rely on intuitive versus analytical thinking.

A new study suggests true AI neutrality is impossible. By analyzing how models describe political figures, scientists discovered that these systems align with the cultural and political values of their developers, often mirroring the worldview of their origin.

A new study finds that people who feel their lives bring value to society are significantly more likely to vote, volunteer, and donate to political causes than those who feel socially disconnected.

A new analysis bypasses subjective voter surveys to examine objective, county-level economic data. The research reveals that localized price increases for everyday necessities closely correlated with a shift toward the Republican candidate, especially in lower-income areas.

A recent study suggests political disagreements within families lead to psychological distress by breaking down positive communication. Researchers found that even politically neutral family members can become targets of moral outrage in highly polarized environments.

A new study published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin reveals that Donald Trump's 2024 election coincided with changing social norms. Specifically, negative campaign rhetoric predicted a growing public acceptance of prejudice toward targeted minority groups.

A new study reveals that left-wing authoritarians frequently use egotistical tactics to manage their social image. Right-wing authoritarians are less likely to use these strategies, unless their beliefs are driven by aggression or submission.

A new study published in Injury Epidemiology reveals that while fewer Americans own guns to advance political goals, more are carrying them for protection at rallies. This shift is particularly notable among Republican gun owners following the 2024 election.

Do gifted individuals see the world differently? Research tracking adults over 35 years finds their political orientations are remarkably average, with one specific exception regarding male conservatism.

New data from the 2024 election reveals a specific profile of Trump supporters: White Americans who believe they are in a "tight race" for status with Black and Hispanic Americans, regardless of their actual wealth.

A new study suggests that the 2024 presidential election prompted Black adults and liberals to change their firearm habits. These groups reported stronger urges to carry weapons and store them for quick access due to safety concerns.